2 April 2014

A spree shooting occurs at the Fort Hood army base in Texas, with four dead, including the gunman, and 16 others injured.

2014 Fort Hood shooting
Bell FortHood.svg
Location of the main cantonment of Fort Hood in Bell County
LocationFort Hood, Texas, U.S.
Coordinates31°8′33″N 97°47′47″W / 31.14250°N 97.79639°W / 31.14250; -97.79639
DateApril 2, 2014 (2014-04-02)
c. 4:00 p.m. – c. 4:08 p.m.[1] (CDT)
Attack type
Spree shooting, shooting, murder-suicide
Weapons.45-caliber Smith & Wesson M&P semi-automatic pistol[2]
Deaths4 (including the perpetrator)[3][4][5]
Injured14 (12 by gunfire)[6]
PerpetratorIvan Lopez[7]

On April 2, 2014, a shooting spree was perpetrated at several locations on the Fort Hood military base near Killeen, Texas. Four people, including the gunman, were killed while 14 additional people were injured; 12 by gunshot wounds.[6][8][9] The shooter, 34-year-old Army Specialist Ivan Lopez, died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound.


Immediately prior to the shooting, Lopez went to the 49th Transportation Battalion administrative office where he tried to seek a ten-day leave form so he could attend to "family matters". However, he was informed that he would have to come back later to retrieve it, sparking a verbal altercation between him and several other soldiers. The request was ultimately denied because Lopez had already secured housing in an apartment in Killeen.[6][10][11]

Lopez then went outside to smoke a cigarette, at approximately 4:00 p.m., he returned and opened fire with a .45-caliber Smith & Wesson M&P pistol inside the same building. He injured two soldiers: Sgt. Jonathan Westbrook, one of the soldiers involved in the altercation with Lopez, who was hit four times; and Maj. Patrick Miller, who sheltered other soldiers in his office despite being shot in the stomach.[6][12] Lopez also killed Sgt. First Class Daniel Ferguson, another soldier involved in the altercation, while the latter was barricading a conference room door[6] that couldn't be locked.

He then got into his car and drove slowly to a motor pool building to which he had been assigned, firing at two soldiers and wounding one of them along the way on 73rd Street. Upon reaching the building, Lopez fired at a soldier inside the office, but missed her and grazed the head of another soldier. He then killed Sgt. Timothy Owens when he approached him and tried to talk him down, and wounded another soldier.[6][13] He then moved on to the building's vehicle bay area, where he injured two soldiers, after which his weapon misfired.[6] Lopez then proceeded to the 1st Medical Brigade headquarters in his car.[citation needed]

Along the way, he fired a round into a car occupied by two soldiers, wounding the passenger. Reaching the intersection of 73rd Street and Motorpool Road, Lopez shot at two other soldiers, but missed both of them. Reaching the medical building, Lopez shot and wounded 1st Lt. John Arroyo Jr., in the throat as he was walking outside in the western parking lot.[6][12] He then entered the building and fatally shot a soldier at the main entrance desk, Staff Sgt. Carlos Lazaney-Rodriguez; he also wounded two other soldiers inside. Then, Lopez walked down the main hallway, wounded another soldier, and exited through a doorway.[6]

Approximately eight minutes after the shooting first started, Lopez drove to the parking lot of another building, Building 39002, where he was confronted by an unidentified military police officer, with whom he had a verbal exchange. When he brandished his weapon, the officer fired a shot at him that missed. Lopez responded by committing suicide, shooting himself in the right side of the head with his own pistol. A total of 34 rounds were fired during the shooting spree: eleven at the administrative office, nine at the motor pool building, five at the medical building, and nine from inside his car.[6] It was later revealed that Lopez, who was in uniform at the time of the shooting, wasn't authorized to carry a concealed firearm.[1][9][14][15][16]


Three people were killed in the shooting, excluding the gunman. They were identified as:[17][18]

Name Age Hometown Rank/occupation Notes
Daniel M. Ferguson 39 Mulberry, Florida, U.S. Sergeant First Class Died while barricading a door
Timothy W. Owens 37 Effingham, Illinois, U.S. Sergeant Died while trying to talk down Lopez
Carlos A. Lazaney-Rodriguez 38 Aguadilla, Puerto Rico Staff Sergeant Died at his post


During the shooting, the Bell County Communications Center dispatched deputies and troopers from the Texas Department of Public Safety to the nearby post after receiving reports of an "active shooter", sheriff's Lt. Donnie Adams said. Federal Bureau of Investigation spokeswoman Michelle Lee said its agents were also headed to the scene. The base confirmed the shooting in a brief statement posted online on April 2, 2014. On its Twitter feed and Facebook page, Fort Hood officials ordered everyone on base to "shelter in place" during the shooting.[19][20][21]

All of the injured victims were taken to Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center,[22] for initial treatment and stabilization. Once they were stabilized they were then transferred to Scott & White Memorial Hospital where they received further care. As of April 10, twelve of the sixteen wounded have been released from the hospitals and returned to duty, while the other four remain hospitalized in stable condition.[13]

Reacting to the incident, President Barack Obama said at a fundraiser in Chicago that he was left "heartbroken" and assured that the events would be investigated.[23] The base was previously the scene of a mass shooting in 2009, in which 13 people were killed and more than 30 wounded. One week after the shooting, Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama traveled to Fort Hood to attend a ceremony honoring the victims.[13]

On April 16, discussion was renewed over if soldiers should be allowed to carry concealed firearms on military bases in Texas and other states.[24]

On January 23, 2015, the Army concluded from an investigation into the shooting that there was no indication of a possibility of violent behavior from Lopez through his medical and personnel records. A report on the investigation cited that Lopez's commanders knew very little of his personal difficulties and would have provided him with help had he disclosed these difficulties. It also highlighted gaps in information sharing, as Lopez's supervisors believed they were unable to obtain his personal information due to federal medical privacy laws. Previously, in the wake of the aforementioned 2009 Fort Hood shooting, information sharing regarding medical history was among 78 recommendations suggested to identify the risk of violent behavior. However, this recommendation was not implemented due to "constraints on exchanging information between military and civilian behavioral health care providers". The 2015 report recommended improvements with the level of contact between commanders and their newly assigned soldiers, and that soldiers should register personally owned weapons with their commanders.[10][25][26]


Ivan A. Lopez-Lopez
Ivan Lopez Fort Hood 2014 - from Commons.jpeg
Ivan A. Lopez-Lopez

(1979-10-23)October 23, 1979
DiedApril 2, 2014(2014-04-02) (aged 34)
Cause of deathSelf-inflicted gunshot wound to the head
Occupation11B (Infantry), 88M (Motor Transport Operator)
MotiveDepression, anxiety, anger over being denied leave[9]

Ivan A. Lopez-Lopez[10][25] (October 23, 1979 – April 2, 2014) was an Iraq War veteran who was born in Ponce, Puerto Rico. He enlisted in the Puerto Rico National Guard on January 4, 1999, but was unable to pass a required English language course and was subsequently discharged on November 30 of the same year. Lopez reenlisted on April 30, 2003, as an infantryman and served until 2010. He served on active duty in the United States Army in June 2008. He was married and had four children, two of them from a previous marriage.[6][10][15][16][27][28]

Service in the U.S. Army

Lopez was a specialist, and at the time of the shooting, he was assigned to the 13th Sustainment Command, a logistics and support unit at Fort Hood. He was previously assigned in Fort Bliss, but was transferred to another base for four months, then moved to Fort Hood two months prior to the shooting.[26] Lopez previously reported at Fort Hood in 2006 during his time in the Puerto Rico National Guard, where he was given orders to deploy to Egypt from February 15, 2007, to February 10, 2008.

From August 6 to December 18, 2011, Lopez served a tour in Iraq, participating in Operation New Dawn as security detail. On or about December 12, his convoy was involved in a roadside bombing.[6] Though Lopez would allege that he had experiences in direct combat in Iraq and cited the bombing of his convoy, investigators determined he was not within the blast radius of the bomb used.[11]

On November 29, 2013, he began receiving MOS reclassification training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, graduating three months later. During his time there, he attempted to purchase a weapon on two separate occasions. On the second occasion, Lopez was persuaded by a classmate to reconsider the purchase.[6]

Motives for the shooting

Lopez was allegedly distraught over financial issues and the deaths of his grandfather and then his mother during a two-month period five months prior to the shooting. He was also undergoing regular psychiatric treatment for depression, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress disorder.[10][25][29] He tried to take leave in order to attend his mother's funeral in Puerto Rico. It took five days for the leave to be approved, but he was only allowed to be absent for 24 hours, which allegedly upset him. The leave was eventually extended to two days.[16][26][27] More recently, Lopez had asked for a transfer, claiming that he was "being taunted and picked on" by other soldiers in his unit.[29]

During a press conference on the day of the shooting, Fort Hood Commander Mark A. Milley stated that Lopez died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. On March 1, 2014, over one month prior to the shooting, Lopez purchased the weapon used in the shooting from Guns Galore, the same store where Nidal Malik Hasan, the convicted perpetrator of the Fort Hood shooting in 2009, originally purchased his own weapon. Lopez's weapon was not registered with the installation.[6][17][26][27] He had previously purchased a firearm of the same model, unregistered with the installation, on February 23, although he reported it stolen on March 1, the same day he bought a replacement.[30] During that same month, he had seen a psychologist and was prescribed Ambien for a sleeping problem.[15]

In his Facebook account, Lopez made posts in which he alleged that he was robbed by two men and also criticized Adam Lanza, the perpetrator of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in 2012. Lopez also described his experiences in direct combat during his tour in Iraq,[11] although military officials confirmed that Lopez did not experience any direct combat.[31][32] A Facebook page created by Lopez claimed that he was a sniper who had been to the Central African Republic.[26]

On March 24, Lopez's battalion began tracking a ten-day permissive temporary duty (PTDY) request he made immediately after arriving to Fort Hood so he could help his family relocate to an apartment in Killeen, as his current one was burglarized. He was given a four-day pass by his acting sergeant, who informed him that he would receive PTDY after his return. Lopez took the pass from March 27 to March 30. He returned to Fort Hood on March 31, though when he received the PTDY form, it was filled with errors and Lopez had to resubmit it with corrections. Though the corrected form was signed, it did not have a control number, which is reported to have led to the conflict in the 49th Transportation Battalion office that sparked the shooting.[6]

See also


  1. ^ a b Welch, William M. (April 7, 2014). "Fort Hood gunman fired 35 shots, including from car". USA Today. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  2. ^ Chandrasekaran, Rajiv; Goldman, Adam; Horwitz, Sari (April 3, 2014). "Gunman in Fort Hood shooting had behavioral issues, authorities say". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 3, 2014.
  3. ^ "Shooter reported dead at Fort Hood, 14 others injured". KVUE. April 2, 2014. Archived from the original on April 5, 2014. Retrieved April 2, 2014.
  4. ^ Berman, Mark (April 2, 2014). "Fort Hood locked down after shooting; at least one dead multiple injuries". The Washington Post. Retrieved April 2, 2014.
  5. ^ Cooper, Mex (April 2, 2014). "Fort Hood shooter reportedly dead". Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved April 2, 2014.
  6. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o "2014 Fort Hood shooting report of investigation". Department of the Army. January 23, 2015. Archived from the original on July 21, 2015. Retrieved June 3, 2015.
  7. ^ Stableford, Dylan; Pfeiffer, Eric (April 3, 2014). "Fort Hood shooting leaves 4 dead, including gunman; 16 injured". Yahoo News. Yahoo!. Retrieved April 3, 2014.
  8. ^ Herskovitz, Jon (April 2014). "Shooter at Fort Hood Army base in Texas, injuries reported – police". Reuters. Retrieved April 2, 2014.
  9. ^ a b c "Fort Hood shooter snapped over denial of request for leave, Army confirms". Fox News Channel. April 7, 2014. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  10. ^ a b c d e Martinez, Luis (January 23, 2015). "Army Report Finds No Warning Signs That Triggered 2014 Fort Hood Shooting". ABC News. Retrieved January 23, 2015.
  11. ^ a b c Fernandez, Manny (January 23, 2015). "Fort Hood Could Not Have Foreseen 2014 Gun Attack, Army Says". The New York Times. Retrieved January 23, 2015.
  12. ^ a b "Remembering the April 2, 2014, Fort Hood shooting". Killeen Daily Herald. April 2, 2015. Retrieved May 27, 2015.
  13. ^ a b c Baker, Peter; Fernandez, Manny (April 9, 2014). "Again, Obama Offers Comfort at Fort Hood After Soldiers Are Killed". The New York Times. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  14. ^ Fernandez, Manny; Blinder, Alan (April 7, 2014). "The New York Times". The New York Times. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  15. ^ a b c "Fort Hood Shooting: What We Know About Ivan Lopez". The Huffington Post. April 3, 2014. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  16. ^ a b c Sanchez, Ray; Brumfield, Ben (April 3, 2014). "Fort Hood shooter was Iraq vet being treated for mental health issues". CNN. Retrieved April 3, 2014.
  17. ^ a b Garza, Lisa Maria; O'Grady, Eileen (April 4, 2014). "'Verbal altercation' may have led to Fort Hood rampage: Army". Reuters. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  18. ^ Ellis, Ralph (April 9, 2014). "Three soldiers slain at Fort Hood identified". CNN. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  19. ^ "Fort Hood". Fort Hood. Twitter. Retrieved April 2, 2014. All personnel on post are asked to shelter in place.
  20. ^ Weissert, Will; Weber, Paul J. (April 2, 2014). "Fort Hood shooter was being assessed for PTSD: Attack leaves four dead and 16 wounded". National Post. Retrieved April 3, 2014.
  21. ^ McLaughlin, Michael (April 2, 2014). "Fort Hood Shooting: Multiple Injuries, Death Reported". Huffington Post. Retrieved April 3, 2014.
  22. ^ "Scott & White press conference". April 2, 2014.
  23. ^ "Obama heartbroken over Shooting at US Army Base in Fort Hood". Indo-Asian News Service. Bihar Prabha. April 3, 2014. Retrieved April 3, 2014.
  24. ^ Langford, Terri (April 16, 2014). "Fort Hood shooting sparks debate on concealed guns". The Texas Tribune. Houston Chronicle.
  25. ^ a b c Alexander, David (January 23, 2015). "Fort Hood shooter showed no clear warning signs: report". Yahoo! News. Retrieved January 23, 2015.
  26. ^ a b c d e Schmall, Emily (January 23, 2015). "Army: Fort Hood lacked system to ID threat of 2014 rampage". Yahoo! News. Retrieved January 23, 2015.
  27. ^ a b c Corbin, Cristina (April 3, 2014). "Fort Hood gunman may have had angry words with fellow soldiers before rampage, Army says". Fox News Channel. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  28. ^ Martinez, Luis (April 3, 2014). "Fort Hood Shooter Had Lengthy but Unremarkable Military Career". ABC News. Retrieved January 23, 2015.
  29. ^ a b Starr, Barbara; Brown, Pamela (April 7, 2014). "Official: Fort Hood gunman claimed he was picked on by fellow soldiers". CNN.
  30. ^ "Report: No Single Factor Led To Fort Hood Shooting Rampage". KWTX-TV. January 23, 2015. Archived from the original on January 26, 2015. Retrieved January 23, 2015.
  31. ^ Coscarelli, Joe (April 4, 2014). "Fort Hood Shooter Ivan Lopez Never Saw Combat". New York. Retrieved April 12, 2014.
  32. ^ Sanchez, Ray (April 5, 2014). "Fort Hood gunman vented on Facebook about Sandy Hook shooter, Iraq". CNN. Retrieved April 12, 2014.

31 December 2014

A New Year’s Eve celebration stampede in Shanghai kills at least 36 people and injures 49 others.

2014 Shanghai stampede
2014 Shanghai stampede.JPG
Date31 December 2014 (2014-12-31)
LocationThe Bund, Shanghai, China
Coordinates31°14′16.9″N 121°29′10.1″E / 31.238028°N 121.486139°E / 31.238028; 121.486139
Non-fatal injuries49

On December 31, 2014, a deadly crush occurred in Shanghai, near Chen Yi Square on the Bund, where around 300,000 people had gathered for the new year celebration. 36 people were killed and there were 49 injured, 13 seriously.[1] As of January 3, 2015, 9 remained in a serious condition.[2]


The incident began at about 23:35 local time on New Year's Eve. The crush centered on a stairway leading up to a viewing platform overlooking the river. Some people were trying to climb to the platform while others were trying to go down, causing panic and confusion.[3][4] People standing on the steps to the viewing platform began to fall down the stairs, collapsing into each other.[5]

There were reports that a planned New Year's light show had been canceled at the last minute and that the crowd control measures required for such a show were not in place.[6]

Rumors of cash coupons

External video
Video (in Chinese)

Early reports stated that people were throwing cash coupons resembling U.S. dollars into the crowd.[7] One of the victims stated that cash coupons were thrown onto the street from a bar and that several of the people had rushed to grab them.[8] However, the Shanghai police later denied social media reports that the stampede was triggered by people stopping to pick up coupons, saying that "video footage showed that the bills had been thrown after the crush took place".[4] An 18-year-old witness told news portal Sina: "I've seen people saying that the stampede happened because people were throwing fake money. But I don't think that's the main reason — there was so much distance, there's no way the money could have blown over to the viewing platform."[3]


Site near the stampede on 1 January
A girl mourning for the victims

At approximately 23:50, people started to realize the danger and began to retreat from the crowd.[9] The police at the scene also started to instruct people to evacuate from the second level. At 23:55, police and citizens had formed a wall to make way for ambulances.[9][10] The injured were then sent to local hospitals.[9]

After the accident, the government of Shanghai formed a working group to coordinate the rescue, led by mayor Yang Xiong.[11]

The identities of all victims have been confirmed, according to the local government.[12] The youngest victim was 12 years old.[12]

As a result of the stampede, similar New Year celebration events on December 31, 2015 were cancelled.


Central government

President and General Secretary of the Communist Party Xi Jinping and Premier Li Keqiang ordered the Shanghai government to "go all out" in its rescue efforts.[13] On January 1, Xi and Li called for an immediate investigation into the source of the accident.[13] Xi Jinping also said a profound lesson should be learned from the incident.[13]

Shanghai government

The local government cancelled all New Year celebration activities on January 1, including the New Year's marathon and Shanghai Tower light show.[14][15] Guyi Garden, Fangta Garden and Yu Garden's Lantern Festival were also cancelled.[16] On the morning of the 1st, citizens mourned for the victims at the Bund.[17]


This stampede was front page on local newspapers on the morning of January 1.[18][19] The media needed to seek authorization for reporting this news, which was impossible to obtain at midnight.[20] The official WeChat account of local government released relevant news at 9 a.m. the next day.[21]

Media reports indicated that the cancellation of a planned light show led to a reduction in the number of police assigned to the event, resulting in only 700 police officers (as compared to 6000 in 2013) at the scene. However, the crowd was no smaller than in previous years, possibly because a scaled-down version of the light show was being held at different venue with a similar name.[5]

Media outlets have faced criticism for publishing personal information posted online by victims or their families.[6]

See also


  1. ^ "Shanghai new year crush kills 35". BBC News. 31 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  2. ^ 上海外滩踩踏重伤员减至9人 所有伤员亲属已找到 (in Chinese). NetEase. 3 January 2015.
  3. ^ a b "Shanghai: dozens killed and injured in stampede at new year celebrations". The Guardian. 1 January 2015.
  4. ^ a b "Shanghai crush: Xi Jinping orders new year investigation". BBC. 2 January 2015.
  5. ^ a b "Sequence of errors led to Shanghai stampede". Washington Post.
  6. ^ a b "Shanghai Stampede: Chinese Media Criticized Amid Conflicting Reports And Confusion". International Business Times. 3 January 2015.
  7. ^ 上海踩踏事故原因仍在调查中 确认有人现场撒钱 (in Chinese). 中国新闻网. 中国广播网. 1 January 2015. Retrieved 1 January 2015.
  8. ^ Jourdan, Adam (1 January 2014). "Shanghai New Year's Eve stampede kills 35 after fake money thrown from building". Reuters. Shanghai. Retrieved Jan 1, 2015.
  9. ^ a b c 上海外滩踩踏事故时间还原 (in Chinese). Netease. 1 January 2015.
  10. ^ 上海外滩踩踏现场:有人自发手拉手维持秩序 (in Chinese). Tencent. 1 January 2015.
  11. ^ 上海成立工作组处置外滩踩踏事件 (in Chinese). Government of Shanghai. 1 January 2015.
  12. ^ a b 上海外滩踩踏事件36位遇难者名单全部公布. People's Daily (in Chinese). 3 January 2015.
  13. ^ a b c "Xi demands immediate investigation into Shanghai stampede" (in Chinese). Xinhuanet. 2 January 2015. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
  14. ^ 杨静 (2015-01-01). "外滩陈毅广场发生踩踏事件 上海取消元旦所有跨年活动". Eastday.com. Retrieved 2015-01-01.
  15. ^ 外滩陈毅广场发生踩踏事件 上海取消元旦所有跨年活动 (in Chinese). Xinhuanet. January 1, 2015. Archived from the original on 2015-01-01. Retrieved 2015-01-02.
  16. ^ Xinmin Evening News (2015-01-10). "本市取消豫园等三大灯会". Netease. Retrieved 2015-01-11.
  17. ^ 上海市民自发在外滩祭奠逝者. People's Daily (in Chinese). 1 January 2015.
  18. ^ 东方早报 - 2015年1月1日 - 封面
  19. ^ 文汇报 - 2015年1月1日 - 封面
  20. ^ "上海踩踏事件敲响纸媒丧钟". 163.com. 3 January 2015.
  21. ^ 上海发布 - 外滩陈毅广场昨夜发生拥挤踩踏事故,致数十人伤亡

External links

28 December 2014

Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501 crashes into the Karimata Strait en route from Surabaya to Singapore, killing all 162 people aboard.

Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501
PK-AXC, the aircraft involved in the accident, photographed in April 2014.
Date28 December 2014 (2014-12-28)
SummaryMishandled non-critical failure leading to stall; crashed into the sea
SiteKarimata Strait, Java Sea
3°37′23″S 109°42′43″E / 3.623°S 109.712°E / -3.623; 109.712 (AirAsia Flight 8501 debris field)Coordinates: 3°37′23″S 109°42′43″E / 3.623°S 109.712°E / -3.623; 109.712 (AirAsia Flight 8501 debris field)[a]
Aircraft typeAirbus A320-216
OperatorIndonesia AirAsia
IATA flight No.QZ8501
ICAO flight No.AWQ8501
Call signWAGON AIR 8501
Flight originJuanda International Airport, Surabaya, Indonesia
DestinationSingapore Changi Airport, Singapore

Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501 (QZ8501/AWQ8501) was a scheduled international passenger flight operated by Indonesia AirAsia – an AirAsia Group affiliate – from Surabaya, Indonesia, to Singapore. On 28 December 2014, the Airbus A320 flying the route crashed into the Java Sea, killing all 162 people on board.[1][2] When search operations ended in March 2015, only 106 bodies had been recovered.[3]

In December 2015, the Indonesian National Transportation Safety Committee (KNKT or NTSC) released a report concluding that a non-critical malfunction in the rudder control system prompted the captain to perform a non-standard reset of the on-board flight control computers. Control of the aircraft was subsequently lost, resulting in a stall and uncontrolled descent into the sea. Miscommunication between the two pilots was cited as a contributing factor.[4][5][6]

History of the flight

Flight path and location of debris. Flight path (red) is limited to range of Flightradar24 coverage; it does not reflect ATC coverage.

Flight 8501 was a scheduled flight from Surabaya, Java, Indonesia to Singapore on Sunday, 28 December 2014. It was scheduled to depart Juanda International Airport at 05:20 Western Indonesian Time (WIB, UTC+7) and arrive at Singapore Changi Airport at 08:30 Singapore Standard Time (SST, UTC+8).[7] Flight 8501 took off at 05:35.[b] Indonesia AirAsia did not have permission from the Indonesian Ministry of Transportation to operate the route on Sundays.[c][10]

After departure, Flight 8501 was in contact with the Jakarta Area Control Centre (callsign: "Jakarta Centre"),[11] which provides air traffic control (ATC) service over the western Java Sea, and flying along air route M635,[11] when it approached a line of thunderstorms off the southwest coast of Borneo.[12] At 06:12, Flight 8501 was flying at flight level 320—approximately 32,000 ft (9,750 m)—when the flight crew requested and was authorised to deviate left from its original flight path to avoid these storms.[13] The pilot then requested to climb to flight level 380,[14] which was deferred by ATC because of other aircraft in the vicinity.[11][15][16][17] AirNav Indonesia, which operates the Jakarta Area Control Centre, reported that Jakarta Centre then cleared Flight 8501 to flight level 340 at 06:14,[d] but no response was received; other aircraft in the vicinity were asked to contact Flight 8501, but also did not receive a response.[11][18]

Between 06:17:00 and 06:17:54, the aircraft climbed from 32,000 to 37,000 ft (9,800 to 11,300 m),[19] exceeding a climb rate of 10,000 feet per minute.[20] The flight data recorder (FDR), showed the aircraft at 35,500 feet (10,800 m)—and still climbing—at 159 knots (294 km/h; 183 mph), which is below the stall speed for the airplane's weight at that altitude.[20] The Indonesian Minister of Transport interpreted the apparent aircraft behaviour at peak altitude as an aerodynamic stall, when it began to descend at 06:17:54, descending 1,000 ft (300 m) within six seconds and 8,000 ft (2,400 m) within 31 seconds.[19] The aircraft also began a turn to the left, forming at least one complete circle before disappearing from radar at 06:18:44.[19][21][22][23][24] Its last recorded position was over the Java Sea, Karimata Strait between the islands of Belitung and Kalimantan (3°22′15″S 109°41′28″E / 3.3708°S 109.6911°E / -3.3708; 109.6911 (AirAsia Flight 8501 last transponder signal)). The aircraft crashed in the Java Sea, Karimata Strait between the islands of Belitung and Borneo (3°37′23″S 109°42′43″E / 3.623°S 109.712°E / -3.623; 109.712 (AirAsia Flight 8501 crash site)).[21][25] The cockpit voice recorder captured multiple warnings, including a stall warning, sounding in the cockpit during the final minutes of the flight.[26] No distress signal was sent from the aircraft.[27][28] Search and rescue (SAR) operations were activated by the Indonesia National Search and Rescue Agency (Basarnas) from the Pangkal Pinang office.[29][30]


The aircraft was an Airbus A320-216,[e] with serial number 3648, registered as PK-AXC. It first flew on 25 September 2008, and was delivered to AirAsia on 15 October 2008. The aircraft was 6 years old and had accumulated approximately 23,000 flight hours over 13,600 flights. It had undergone its most recent scheduled maintenance on 16 November 2014.[9] The aircraft was powered by two CFM International CFM56-5B6 engines and was configured to carry 180 passengers.[31]


Persons on board by nationality:[32]
Nationality Passenger Crew Total
Indonesia[f] 149 6 155
South Korea 3 0 3
France[g] 0 1 1
Malaysia 1 0 1
Singapore 1 0 1
United Kingdom[h][33] 1 0 1
Total 155 7 162

AirAsia released details of the 155 passengers which included 137 adults, 17 children, and one infant. The crew consisted of two pilots and four flight attendants. A company engineer was also on board and was not counted as one of the passengers.[34]

The pilots on board the flight were:[35]

  • Captain Iriyanto,[i] age 53, an Indonesian national, had a total of 20,537 flying hours, of which 4,687 hours were on the Airbus A320. The captain began his career with the Indonesian Air Force, graduating from pilot school in 1983 and previously flying fighter jet aircraft. He took early retirement from the air force in the mid-2000s to join Adam Air, and later worked for Merpati Nusantara Airlines and Sriwijaya Air before joining Indonesia AirAsia. He had 6,100 flying hours with Indonesia AirAsia.[36]
  • First Officer Rémi Emmanuel Plesel, age 46, a French national, had a total of 2,247[37]:22 flying hours, including 1,367 hours on the Airbus A320.[34] He was originally from Le Marigot, Martinique,[38] and had studied and worked in Paris. He was living in Indonesia.[39]

Forty-one people who were on board the AirAsia flight were members of a single church congregation in Surabaya. Most were families with young children travelling to Singapore for a new year's holiday.[40]

The bodies began to be returned to their families on 1 January 2015. At that time, the East Java Regional Police Department's Disaster Victim Identification commissioner stated that the victims were identified by the means of post mortem results, thumb prints, and their personal belongings.[41]

Search and recovery

Shortly after the aircraft was confirmed to be missing, unconfirmed reports stated that wreckage had been found off the island of Belitung in Indonesia.[42][43][44] Indonesia's National Search and Rescue Agency (Basarnas) deployed seven ships and two helicopters to search the shores of Belitung and Kalimantan.[45] The Indonesian Navy and the provincial Indonesian National Police Air and Water Unit each sent out search and rescue teams.[46] In addition, an Indonesian Air Force Boeing 737 reconnaissance aircraft was dispatched to the last known location of the airliner.[47]

The Indonesian Navy dispatched four ships by the end of the first search day and the Air Force deployed aircraft including a CASA/IPTN CN-235.[48] The Indonesian Army deployed ground troops to search the shores and mountains of adjacent islands.[49] Local fishermen also participated in the search.

Ongoing search and rescue operations were under the guidance of the Civil Aviation Authority of Indonesia.[50] The search was suspended at 7:45 pm local time on 28 December due to darkness and bad weather, to be resumed in daylight.[51] An operations center to coordinate search efforts was set up in Pangkal Pinang.[52] The search area was a 270-nautical-mile (500 km) radius near Belitung Island.[7]

Search and rescue operations quickly became an international effort. By 30 December naval and air units from Singapore, Malaysia and Australia had joined Indonesian authorities in patrolling designated search areas.[53] Singapore's Rescue Coordination Centre (RCC) deployed three C-130 Hercules aircraft to aid in the search and rescue operation.[54][55] A Formidable-class frigate, a Victory-class corvette, a Landing Ship Tank, and a submarine support and rescue vessel subsequently took part in the search and rescue after Indonesia's National Search and Rescue Agency accepted the offer of help from the Republic of Singapore Navy. Singapore's Ministry of Transport provided specialist teams from the Air Accident and Investigation Bureau and underwater locator equipment.[55] The Malaysian government set up a rescue coordination centre at Subang and deployed three military vessels and three aircraft, including a C-130, to assist in search and rescue operations.[56][57][58] Australia deployed a P-3 Orion to assist in the search and rescue operation.[59][60] Elements of the United States Navy joined the search effort; USS Sampson arrived on station late on 30 December,[61] and USS Fort Worth on 3 January.[62]

By 5 January, 31 bodies had been recovered with the aid of the Russian and the US search teams.[63] Divers entered the main section of the fuselage underwater and discovered 6 bodies on 24 January.[64][65]

More than ninety vessels and aircraft from Indonesia, Singapore, Malaysia, Australia, South Korea, Japan, China, the United States, and Russia participated in the search.[66][67][68][69] This fleet included three ships with underwater detectors and two fuel tankers seconded to ensure efficient operation of the vessels in the search area.[70] On 2 January the Indonesian Ministry of Transport reported that two other Indonesian tender vessels had been fitted with equipment which could detect acoustic signals from the flight recorder ("black box") beacons and airframe metal, as well as multibeam side scan sonar.[71]

The official search for bodies ended on 17 March, after 106 bodies had been recovered. 56 bodies remained unaccounted for.[3][72][73]

A live Reddit feed that was constantly updating the details of the search and recovery efforts, leaked details of the operation. An April press conference revealed details discovered by the Basarnas rescue team divers. 115 remains (including body parts) were recovered. 111 of them are believed to be from 99 passengers.[74]


An offshore supply ship with the tail of PK-AXC on its stern on 10 January 2015

On the day of the disappearance, a fisherman observed "a lot of debris, small and large, near Pulau Tujuh. [...] It looked like the Air Asia colours."[75][76][77] Another fisherman reported that, while moored on Sunday at Pulau Senggora, south of the town of Pangkalan Bun in Central Kalimantan, "Around 7 am, I heard a loud booming sound. Soon afterwards, there was haze that usually happened only during the dry season. [...] Before the exploding sound, my friends saw a plane from above Pulau Senggaro heading towards the sea. The plane was said to be flying relatively low, but then disappeared."[78][79]

The fishermen's reports, delivered after they had returned home the next day, were credited with guiding the search-and-rescue team to the vicinity of the crash.[78] The first items of wreckage were spotted by search aircraft on 30 December in the Karimata Strait, 10 km (6.2 mi; 5.4 nmi) from where the crew last contacted air traffic control,[80][81][82][83] and three bodies were recovered by the warship KRI Bung Tomo.[84][85][86][87][j]

On 31 December, Basarnas claimed that a sonar image obtained 30 December by an Indonesian naval ship appeared to show an aircraft upside down on the seabed in about 24–30 m (80–100 ft) of water, about 3.2–3.5 km (2.0–2.2 mi; 1.7–1.9 nmi) from the debris found on 30 December.[90][91][92] The head of the Search and Rescue Agency also denied the existence of any sonar images of the wreckage (as well as the reported recovery of a body wearing a life vest).[21] He stressed that only official information from his search-and-rescue service can be considered to be reliable.

On 2 January 2015, Basarnas reported evidence of a fuel slick on the water surface in the search area, but detection of the fuselage remained unconfirmed.[70]

At a press conference given on the morning of 3 January by Basarnas, the discovery of two large submerged objects was reported: 9.4 m × 4.8 m × 0.4 m (30.8 ft × 15.7 ft × 1.3 ft), and a thin object 7.2 m × 0.5 m (23.6 ft × 1.6 ft).[93] Also, the previously reported fuel slick was confirmed. A later media report mentioned four large sections of wreckage, the largest being 18 m × 5.4 m × 2.2 m (59.1 ft × 17.7 ft × 7.2 ft) located at 3°55′27″S 110°31′31″E / 3.9242°S 110.5252°E / -3.9242; 110.5252 (AirAsia Flight 8501 first wreckage).[94] Later in the day, Basarnas announced[95] no more bodies were found, leaving the total at 30.[95]

On 7 January, divers found parts of the aircraft, including a section of the tail.[96] Other sections of the tail are expected to lie nearby.[97][98] On 10 January divers used an inflatable device to bring the aircraft's tail to the surface of the sea.[99][100] They continued to search the sea floor within 500 m (1,600 ft) of where faint pings were heard.[101]

The flight data recorder was recovered by Indonesian divers on 12 January at 3°37′21″S 109°42′42″E / 3.6225°S 109.7117°E / -3.6225; 109.7117 (AirAsia Flight 8501 FDR salvage),[102] within 4 km (2.5 mi) of part of the fuselage and tail.[21] Later in the day, the cockpit voice recorder was located[103] and was recovered the following day.[104]

On 14 January, the Republic of Singapore Navy Submarine rescue vessel Swift Rescue located a large section of the fuselage with one wing attached.[105] On 25 January, ropes around the fuselage snapped during an initial failed effort to raise the wreckage. Four bodies were recovered, taking the total recovered to 69. More bodies were thought to be inside. Rear Admiral Widodo, who is in charge of recovery operations, said that the fuselage might be too fragile to be lifted.[106]

On 27 February salvage workers recovered a large piece of fuselage, including the wings, of the A320. Lifting balloons were used to lift the fuselage, but the first attempt failed as the balloons deflated.[107] By March 2015, all large pieces of fuselage from the jet had been lifted from the seafloor and moved for investigative purposes.



An emergency call center was established by the airline for the families of those who were on board the aircraft,[108] and an emergency information center was set up at Juanda International Airport to provide hourly updates as well as lodging for victims' relatives.[109] Smaller posts were also opened at Soekarno–Hatta International Airport[110] and Sultan Hasanuddin International Airport.[111]

On 31 December 2014, Indonesia AirAsia retired the flight number QZ8501, changing the designation of its Surabaya-Singapore route to QZ678. The return flight number was also changed, from QZ8502 to QZ679.[112] The Surabaya-Singapore route by AirAsia was then terminated on 4 January 2015.[113]

Subsequent to the 1 December 2015 NTSC report as to the causes of the crash, the airline said it had already implemented improved pilot training.[114][115]


Immediately after the NTSC report on the crash was released on 1 December 2015, the manufacturer of the A320 aircraft was not ready to provide a comment, stating in an e-mail that "Airbus has just received the final accident report. We are now carefully studying its content."[116][needs update]


AirAsia did not have any official permission to fly the Surabaya–Singapore route on Sunday – the day of the crash – but was licensed on four other days of the week, and, according to an Indonesian Ministry of Transport statement, "The Indonesian authorities are suspending the company's flights on this route with immediate effect pending an investigation."[10] In response on the same day, the Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore (CAAS) and the Changi Airport Group (CAG) made a clarification that AirAsia QZ8501 "has been given approval at Singapore's end to operate a daily flight for the Northern Winter Season from 26 October 2014 to 28 March 2015".[117]

On 6 January 2015, Indonesian Ministry of Transport representative Djoko Murjatmojo stated that "officials at the airport operator in Surabaya and [the] air traffic control agency who had allowed the flight to take off had been moved to other duties", and an immediate air transport directive had been issued "making it mandatory for pilots to go through a face-to-face briefing by an airline flight operations officer on weather conditions and other operational issues prior to every flight".[118]

The loss of Flight 8501 also brought attention to the lack of weather radar at Indonesian air traffic control centres.[119][120] According to the Toronto Star, "Indonesia’s aviation industry has been plagued with problems ... pilot shortages, shoddy maintenance and poor oversight have all been blamed following a string of deadly accidents in recent years."[115]

The West Kotawaringin administration in Pangkalan Bun, Central Kalimantan, planned to build a memorial for the Air Asia flight which also doubles as a monument for aviation safety. Central Kalimantan deputy governor Achmad Diran also stated that the monument is also going to be the symbol of gratitude and appreciation for the efforts of the National Search and Rescue Agency. The cornerstone ceremony took place on Wednesday, and was attended by local and state officials and representatives from Australia and Singapore. West Kotawaringin regent Ujang Iskandar stated that "With this monument, we hope that the families and the government will lay flowers every 28 December, and continue the dialogue on aviation safety in Indonesia." On 22 March, there was a gathering of people near the site of the crash and the crowd laid flowers around.[121]

Family members of crew members and passengers

Air Asia has reportedly offered US$32,000 or Rp300 million to each of the grieving family members of the victims of the accident as initial compensation from an overall part of compensation, Wall Street Journal claimed from a letter on Air Asia stationery dated 2 January grieving family member David Thejakusuma received; who had 7 family members on the flight, the amount for each family member he lost.[122]

On 16 March 2015, Monash University awarded in the form of posthumous title (award of posthumous degree) the Bachelor of Commerce to one of the late crash victims, Kevin Alexander Sujipto. Professor Colm Kearney, Dean of the Faculty of Business and Economics presented it to a member of his family. A memorial service was held alongside the presentation of the award, and was attended by the Consul General of Indonesia for Victoria and Tasmania, Dewi Savitri Wahab, 40 of the deceased's friends and representatives from the Indonesian Student Association in Australia (PPIA) Monash University branch.[123]

On 28 December 2015, the first anniversary of the crash, a private prayer service was held in a private room in Mahameru Building, East Java Regional Police, Surabaya, and was attended by family members and relatives of the victims of the crash. The service was also attended by the Head Chief of the Search and Rescue Agency Henry Bambang Soelistyo. Representatives from the family members asked the National Transportation Safety Committee to ensure the safety of air travel in Indonesia. The Indonesian Government was also asked by the family members to ratify the Montreal Convention, finally ratified on 19 May 2017.[124][125]

Legal proceedings

France opened a criminal investigation to investigate possible manslaughter charges.[126] The family of the first officer, a French national, have filed a lawsuit against AirAsia in connection to the lack of permission to fly on that day, claiming the airline was "endangering the life of others".[126]

Surabaya Mayor Tri Rismaharini says her administration is ready to sue AirAsia should it ignore the rights of the families of passengers on flight QZ8501, following the suspension of the airline's flight permit from the East Java city to Singapore. Risma said her administration had also consulted with legal experts from Airlangga University on the fears of most families regarding the difficulties in disbursing insurance funds, after the Transportation Ministry regarded the Surabaya-Singapore flight on Dec. 28 as illegitimate. She said her administration continued to collect data on the victims, including their valuable belongings. The data would later be used for insurance purposes and matters related to the beneficiary rights of the affected families.[127]

A US-based aviation lawyer was planning to sue AirAsia claiming that they are "representing" 10 families over an aircraft malfunction following the crash of Flight QZ8501. Principal of Chicago-based Wisner Law Firm Floyd Wisner said that although preliminary investigations found that weather was a factor, the Airbus A320-200 suffered a malfunction of the fly-by-wire system. According to the statement, the lawsuit, which was filed in the US state of Illinois, states that "at the time the accident aircraft left the control of defendant Airbus, it was defectively and unreasonably dangerous," and names Honeywell International, Motorola Inc and other suppliers along with Airbus as defendants.[128][129]

The case was Aris Siswanto et al. v Airbus, SAS et al., 1:15-cv-05486. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Chicago). On 30 June 2015, the suit had still named only Airbus and its suppliers but AirAsia was to be added as a defendant, according to Floyd Wisner of the Wisner law firm.[130] However, on 9 December 2016, the case was dismissed and the lawsuit was dropped.[131]

Air transport industry

Following the recovery of the flight recorders, on 12 and 13 January, an anonymous International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) representative said, "The time has come that deployable recorders are going to get a serious look." Unlike military recorders, which jettison away from an aircraft and float on the water, signalling their location to search and rescue bodies, recorders on commercial aircraft sink. A second ICAO official said that public attention had "galvanized momentum in favour of ejectable recorders on commercial aircraft".[132]

Indonesian tourism

Indonesia's tourism was badly affected by the accident. According to the head of Indonesia's Central Statistics Agency (CSA) Suryamin in a press conference at his office on 1 April 2015, the accident caused the number of foreign visitors to decline. Figures from the Indonesian Ministry of Tourism showed that the number of incoming foreign tourists at Surabaya's Juanda Airport declined by 5.33%, Jakarta's Soekarno-Hatta International Airport by 15.01%, and Bandung's Husein Sastranegara Airport by 10.66%.[133]


The events leading to the crash were investigated by Indonesia's National Transportation Safety Committee (KNKT or NTSC). Assistance was provided by Australia, France, Singapore, and Malaysia.[134]

Data from the flight data recorder were downloaded.[135] 124 minutes of cockpit dialogue was successfully extracted from the cockpit voice recorder. The sound of many alarms from the flight system can be heard in the final minutes, almost drowning out the voices of the pilots. The investigators ruled out a terrorist attack as the cause and then examined the possibility of human error or aircraft malfunction.[26] The aircraft altitude recorded by ATC radar increased from 32,000 to 37,000 ft (9,750 to 11,300 m) between 06:17:00 and 06:17:54 WIB, at an initial rate of up to 6,000 ft/min (1,830 m/min). At 06:17:54, the aircraft descended from 37,000 to 36,000 ft (11,300 to 11,000 m) in six seconds, and from 36,000 to 29,000 ft (11,000 to 8,840 m) in 25 seconds.[19][136]

Although the aircraft's route took it through areas of cloud that extended from 12,000 ft (3,700 m) up to 44,000 ft (13,000 m), FDR data showed that weather was not a factor in the accident.[37]:117[k]

Acting director of Air Transportation, Djoko Murjatmodjo, clearly stated that the investigation of the flight route and the investigation of the crash itself are separate. Murjatmodjo said that "AirAsia is clearly wrong because they didn’t fly at a time and schedule that was already determined."[107] Both Singapore's civil aviation authority and the Changi Airport Group stated that Air Asia was allowed daily flights between Surabaya and Singapore.[138] Tatang Kurniadi, head of Indonesia's national transportation safety committee, stated that sabotage was ruled out as a cause of the accident by the black boxes, and a preliminary report was supposedly submitted to the International Civil Aviation Organisation by early February.[citation needed]

Final NTSC report

After studying the wreckage of the Airbus A320-216 as well as the two black boxes and the cockpit recorder, Indonesia's National Transportation Safety Committee issued a report with their conclusions from the investigation on 1 December 2015. The report stated that the sequence of events that led to the crash started with a malfunction in two of the plane's rudder travel limiter units (RTLU).[139] A tiny soldered electrical connection in the plane's RTLU was found to be cracked, likely for over a year, causing it to intermittently send amber master caution warnings to the electronic centralised aircraft monitor (ECAM)—with the plane's maintenance records showing that the RTLU warning had been sent 23 times over the previous year, but was always solved (and never further investigated, which could have addressed the underlying electrical problem) by resetting the RTLU system.[140][141][142] On this flight, the RTLU issue sent an amber caution warning four different times, and the first three times that the ECAM system gave the warning "Auto Flight Rudder Travel Limiter System", the pilot in command followed the ECAM instructions, toggling the flight augmentation computer (FAC) 1 and 2 buttons on the cockpit's overhead panel to off and then on.[143] This procedure did clear the amber master caution warnings for each of those first three warnings.[144]

Specifics in the report indicate that French First Officer Rémi Emmanuel Plesel was at the controls just before the stall warning sounded in the cockpit indicating that the jet had lost lift. Investigators also found that, just moments earlier—on the fourth occurrence of the RTLU warning during the flight—the Captain chose to ignore the procedure advised by the ECAM instructions, and, instead, left his seat and reset the circuit breaker of the entire FAC,[140][145] unintentionally disengaging multiple flight control systems, which would have to be turned on by the pilots after the circuit breakers are reset.[146] This circuit breaker is not on the list of circuit breakers that are allowed to be reset in flight,[37]:106[l] and disabling both FACs placed the aircraft in alternate law mode, disengaging the autopilot and stopping the automatic stall protection and bank angle protection.[147] The FAC is the part of the fly-by-wire system in A320 aircraft responsible for controlling flight surfaces including the rudder. Without the FAC's computerized flight augmentation, pilots would have to "rely on manual flying skills that are often stretched during a sudden airborne emergency".[148] When the crew was required to fly the Airbus A320 manually, there was an unexplained nine-second delay between the start of the roll and either pilot attempting to take control.[149] After nine seconds, the aircraft was banking at a 54° angle.

The report did not specifically conclude that pilot error caused the crash[150] while detailing the chain of events leading to the loss of Flight 8501. However, one of the investigators, the NTSC's Nurcahyo Utomo, referred to an apparent miscommunication between the pilots (based on the recordings on the cockpit voice recorder) and said that the malfunction should not have led to a total loss of control had they followed the recommended procedure.[4]

Side-stick control issue

The example of miscommunication between the pilots was when the plane was in a critical stalling condition, the co-pilot misunderstood the captain's command "pull down"; instead of pushing the airplane's nose down (pushing forward on the stick to regain speed and escape the stall), he pulled the stick back, which would have ordered the plane to climb more steeply. Because the captain was also pushing the stick forward and because Airbus has a dual-input system, the two stick inputs cancelled each other out, which led to the plane remaining in a stall condition until the end of the black box recording. (See the similar side-stick control issue in the Air France Flight 447 accident.)

On 3 December 2015, Indonesia's air transportation director general, Suprasetyo, said that the National Safety Transportation Board (KNKT) had provided recommendations as to tightened controls on aircraft maintenance and flight crew competence. He added that the government had implemented "... a series of corrective actions as a preventive measure so that the same accident will not happen again in the future."[151] Suprasetyo also confirmed that the suspension of Indonesia AirAsia's Surabaya–Singapore route would not be lifted until the carrier had completed the steps recommended by the KNKT.

The report stated that the crash resulted from the flight crew's inability to control the aircraft in alternate law. The cracking of a solder joint resulted in the failure of the Rudder Travel Limiter Unit four times during the flight. The flight crew action to the first three faults was in accordance with the Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor messages. Following the fourth fault, the Flight Augmentation Computer's circuit breakers were reset by the flight crew, resulting in electrical interruption to the computers causing the autopilot to disengage and the flight control logic to change to Alternate Law. The rudder deflected 2 degrees to the left, causing the aircraft to roll up to 54 degrees. Subsequent flight crew actions resulted in the aircraft entering a prolonged stall from which they were unable to recover.[152]

Events leading to crash based on report

Flight 8501 took off at 05:35 WIB and reached its cruising altitude at flight level (FL) 320 (32,000 feet (9,800 m)) four minutes later and was on a 329 degree heading.[1][37]

At 05:57, the aircraft's anti-ice system was turned on at the request of first officer Plesel. The flight was normal until 06:00 when the following ECAM memo was displayed (along with a master caution light):

AUTO FLT RUD TRV LIM 1 (Auto Flight Rudder Travel Limiter 1)

One minute later the single chime alarm sounded and the Master Caution light came on. The ECAM then displayed:

AUTO FLT RUD TRV LIM SYS (Auto Flight Rudder Travel Limiter System)

Captain Iriyanto read the actions for fixing this failure (which involved rebooting two of the aircraft's Flight Augmentation Computers (FAC)), saying, "FAC 1 off and on. FAC 2 off and on." The flight crew then contacted Jakarta Air Traffic Control (with captain Iriyanto making radio communications as pilot monitoring), and requested to climb to FL 380 (38,000 feet (12,000 m)) to avoid the weather, as well as turn 15 degrees to the left for the same reason. The controller rejected the first request due to traffic in the area though but gave permission to 15 degrees left. The flight crew acknowledged. This was the last communication from Flight 8501.

First officer Plesel then gave a cruise briefing, stating that the flight would divert to Ahmad Yani International Airport in case of an emergency arising in flight.[1][37]

The same alarm sounded and the same ECAM memo displayed three more times at 06:09, 06:13, and 06:16 respectively, totaling four times all together. At 06:16, Flight 8501 was cleared to climb to FL 380 but received no response.[1]

The flight crew took the proper actions for the first, second, and third memos. When the memo displayed for the fourth time however, captain Iriyanto, frustrated, decided to reset to the FAC circuit breakers (CB), having previously seen this action being performed by a ground engineer, and believed that it was okay to perform this action in flight. However, resetting FAC CB's was actually prohibited in flight. Although Airbus described resetting FAC CB's in documents, it did not describe the results of what happened if the same action was performed in flight. Only pilots who had a strong understanding of the aircraft's systems knew what would happen if an FAC CB was reset in flight.[1]

The CB's were reset, followed by several Master Cautions sounding regarding FAC's 1 and 2. The autopilot and auto throttle both disengaged from the circuit breaker reset, and the flight control law changed from Normal to Alternate. First officer Plesel only reacted nine seconds after all of these actions, likely having been distracted by them. At this time, the aircraft was banked left at 54 degrees and the roll angle was nine degrees right. Captain Iriyanto said, "level, level, level," in response to the roll. Plesel, possibly spatially disoriented due to the roll sensation, over-corrected twice: first by making a sharp right bank input and then a sharp left bank input. Plesel then made a nose-up input on his side-stick, causing the aircraft to enter a steep climb at a 24 degree nose-up pitch. At 06:16 the stall warning sounded for one second. One minute later, at 06:17:17, the stall warning sounded again and continued to sound for the remainder of the flight. At this time the angle of attack was at 40 degrees. The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) also recorded an increase in background noise which also continued for the remainder of the flight. The following was recorded on the CVR:[37]:58

Cockpit area microphone (CAM): [sound of aircraft stall warning starts and continues until the end of the recording; increased background noise starts and also continues until the end of the recording]

Captain: Pull down... pull down.

First officer: What is going wrong? (spoken in French)

Captain: My god.

In just 54 seconds, the aircraft climbed from FL 320 to 38,500 feet (11,700 m), at which point the aircraft entered a stall, descending at a rate of 20,000 feet (6,100 m) per minute. Captain Iriyanto made a nose-down input on his side-stick (though without saying the terminology phrase "I have control"[37]:113) and instructed first officer Plesel to do the same; Plesel said that he was trying, but continued to make nose-up inputs. The aircraft made one full circle as altitude was lost. At 29,000 feet (8,800 m), the aircraft descent range changed to 12,000 feet (3,700 m) per minute. At 06:20:35 the flight data recorder stopped recording. The CVR stopped recording one second later, at 06:20:36.[37]:56 The aircraft crashed into the Java Sea and was destroyed. All 162 people on board were killed.[1][37]


The crash was dramatized in the 16th season of the TV Series Mayday, in an episode entitled "Deadly Solution",[140] aired just over two years after the crash on February 6, 2017. Also, Science Channel aired a documentary on April 28, 2015 called "AirAsia 8501: Anatomy of a Crash".

See also


  1. ^ Location where the aircraft's flight data recorder was found on the sea floor.
  2. ^ Also reported as occurring at 05:36 or 05:32 WIB.[8][9]
  3. ^ Indonesia AirAsia did have permission to fly this route four other days of the week.[10]
  4. ^ At least one version of the story claims that Flight 8501 requested to climb, but did not specify to what altitude and that Jakarta Centre asked for an altitude, but no response was given by Flight 8501.[18]
  5. ^ The aircraft was an Airbus A320-200 model; the 16 specifies it was fitted with CFM International CFM56-5B6 engines.
  6. ^ 149 passengers and six crew members, including the Captain
  7. ^ One crew member, the first officer
  8. ^ Dual British-Hong Kong citizen boarding with British passport.
  9. ^ Iriyanto is a mononym (one-word name), which is common for Indonesian names.
  10. ^ At 10:05 UTC, Reuters, quoting Indonesian official Manahan Simorangkir, reported that 40 bodies had been recovered,[88] but this was later retracted by an Indonesian navy spokesman as a "miscommunication by staff".[89]
  11. ^ The Indonesian Agency for Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics speculated in the days immediately after the accident that atmospheric icing "which can cause engine damage due to a cooling process" was believed to be a significant factor, but this proved to be incorrect.[137]
  12. ^ Page 106: "The FAC CBs were not included in the list of the CB allowed in OEB and TDUs to be reset in flight."


  1. ^ a b c d e f Ranter, Harro (28 December 2014). "Database – Accident Description". aviation-safety.net. Aviation Safety Network (ASN). Retrieved 29 December 2014.
  2. ^ "AirAsia QZ8501: More bad weather hits AirAsia search". BBC News. 1 January 2015.
  3. ^ a b "AirAsia 8501 crash: Official search for bodies ends". bbc.com. BBC. 17 March 2015. Archived from the original on 18 March 2015. Retrieved 17 March 2015.
  4. ^ a b Karmini, Niniek (1 December 2015). "AirAsia crash caused by faulty rudder system, pilot response, Indonesia says". Toronto Star (The Associated Press). Toronto, Canada. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  5. ^ Sherwell, Philip (1 December 2015). "Pilots responding to malfuctioning plane part caused AirAsia crash which killed 162 passengers off Indonesia". The Telegraphy. London, England. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  6. ^ Lamb, Kate (1 December 2015). "AirAsia crash: crew lost control of plane after apparent misunderstanding". The Guardian. London, England. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  7. ^ a b Sentana, I Made; Raghuvanshi, Gaurav (29 December 2014). "Search for Missing AirAsia Flight 8501 Resumes". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
  8. ^ "Tweet". Twitter (in Indonesian). Kementerian Perhubungan Republik Indonesia (Indonesia Transport Ministry). 28 December 2014. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
  9. ^ a b "AirAsia 8501 Missing: Timeline of Events". ABC News. 28 December 2014. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
  10. ^ a b c "AirAsia QZ8501: Search teams find more bodies at sea". BBC News. 2 January 2015. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  11. ^ a b c d Hradecky, Simon (28 December 2014). "Crash: Indonesia Asia A320 over Java Sea on Dec 28th 2014, aircraft lost height and impacted waters". avherald.com. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
  12. ^ "AirAsia Flight 8501:Preliminary meteorological analysis". Weather Graphics. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  13. ^ "AirAsia jet carrying 162 missing on way to Singapore". CNN. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  14. ^ Leung, Nancy (29 December 2014). "Missing AirAsia Flight QZ8501: At a glance". CNN. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
  15. ^ Bengali, Shashank (28 December 2014). "AirAsia Flight 8501 probably 'at bottom of sea,' official says". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
  16. ^ "AirAsia Indonesia flight QZ8501 to Singapore missing". BBC News. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  17. ^ "AirAsia flight QZ8501: Was plane flying too slow for its altitude?". The Straits Times. 29 December 2014. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  18. ^ a b "QZ8501 flight path not safe, says aviation expert". The Malaysian Insider. Edge Insider Sdn Bhd. 30 December 2014. Archived from the original on 6 January 2015. Retrieved 5 January 2015.
  19. ^ a b c d e "AirAsia Plane Often Experiences Trouble, Former Pilot Says". Tempo. 25 January 2015. Retrieved 25 January 2015.
  20. ^ a b KNKT PK-AXC Final Report, Page 58
  21. ^ a b c d e Hradecky, Simon (30 December 2014). "Crash: Indonesia Asia A320 over Java Sea on Dec 28th 2014, aircraft went missing believed to have impacted waters". The Aviation Herald. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  22. ^ Schabner, Dean; McGuire, Bill; Candea, Ben (28 December 2014). "Search and Rescue Operation Resume for Missing AirAsia Jet". ABC News. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  23. ^ "AirAsia jet with 162 on board goes missing on way to Singapore". CNN International Edition. 28 December 2014. Archived from the original on 28 December 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  24. ^ "AirAsia QZ8501: Indonesia plane search resumes". BBC. 29 December 2014.
  25. ^ "AirAsia flight from Indonesia to Singapore loses contact". The Sydney Morning Herald. 29 December 2014. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  26. ^ a b "AirAsia jet's alarms 'screaming' at crash". The Sydney Morning Herald. AFP. 21 January 2015. Retrieved 21 January 2015.
  27. ^ Nusatya, Chris; Fabi, Randy (28 December 2014). "AirAsia flight carrying 162 people goes missing in Southeast Asia – officials". Reuters. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  28. ^ "Live: AirAsia flight from Indonesia to Singapore loses contact with air traffic control". ABC News. AU: Australian Broadcasting Corp. 28 December 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  29. ^ "AirAsia flight QZ8501 from Indonesia to Singapore loses contact with air traffic control". The Australian Broadcasting Corp. 28 December 2014. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  30. ^ "QZ8501: Singapore activated coordination centre to assist in SAR". The New Straits Times Press (M) Berhad. 28 December 2014. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  31. ^ "Seat options". Indonesia AirAsia. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  32. ^ "[Updated statement] QZ8501 (as at 6:54pm, GMT+8)". AirAsia Facebook. 28 December 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  33. ^ Chan, Samuel (29 December 2014). "Hong Kong resident among passengers on missing AirAsia flight". South China Morning Post. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  34. ^ a b AirAsia. "AirAsia Indonesia Flight QZ8501". Archived from the original on 4 January 2015. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  35. ^ "LIVE BLOG: AirAsia QZ8501 from Indonesia to Singapore missing". Channel NewsAsia. 28 December 2014. Archived from the original on 28 December 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  36. ^ "AirAsia flight QZ8501: Pilot Iriyanto was one of military academy's best graduates". Straits Times. 30 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  37. ^ a b c d e f g h i "Aircraft Accident Investigation Report Airbus A320-216; PK-AXC" (PDF). KOMITE NASIONAL KESELAMATAN TRANSPORTASI. 28 December 2014.
  38. ^ "Crash d'Air Asia : "Enfant, il voulait être pilote", témoigne la mère de Rémi Plésel" [Air Asia crash: "Child, he wanted to be a pilot", testifies the mother of Rémi Plésel]. leparisien.fr (in French). M. Pf. avec AFP. 29 December 2014. Archived from the original on 30 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  39. ^ "Le copilote de l'avion d'AirAsia disparu entre l'Indonésie et Singapour est un martiniquais" [The co-pilot of the AirAsia plane disappears between Indonesia and Singapore is a Martinican]. Martinique la 1ère (in French). Archived from the original on 30 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  40. ^ Patience, Martin (4 January 2015). "AirAsia QZ8501: 41 people are missing from one church". BBC. Retrieved 23 March 2018.
  41. ^ "QZ8501: Body of first victim identified". Astro Awani. 1 January 2015. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  42. ^ "Indonesian portal reports of plane crash in Belitung Timur". Archived from the original on 28 December 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  43. ^ "AirAsia flight QZ8501: Last position believed to be between Belitung island and Kalimantan". 28 December 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  44. ^ "BREAKING: AirAsia flight QZ8501 with 162 on board goes missing after take-off". YouTube. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  45. ^ "Basarnas Fokus Cari Pesawat AirAsia di Sekitar Pantai Tanjung Pandan dan Pontianak". Kompas. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  46. ^ "Basarnas dispatches vessel for AirAsia search operation". The Jakarta Post. 28 December 2014.
  47. ^ "Cari Pesawat AirAsia, TNI AU Kerahkan Boeing 737 Surveillance". Kompas. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  48. ^ "Empat Kapal Perang TNI Angkatan Laut Dikerahkan Cari AirAsia QZ 8510". Kompas. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  49. ^ "TNI AD Diminta Cari AirAsia QZ 8501 dari Darat Hingga Pegunungan". Kompas. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  50. ^ "AirAsia flight QZ8501 with 162 people on board goes missing after takeoff from Indonesia on the way to Singapore, search and rescue underway". National Post. 27 December 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  51. ^ "Search called off for day 1 due to darkness and bad weather". Asian Correspondent. 29 December 2014. Archived from the original on 28 December 2014.
  52. ^ "Basarnas Kendalikan Posko Taktis Pencarian AirAsia QZ 8501 di Pangkal Pinang" [Basarnas Take Control of Tactical Search Post for AirAsia QZ 8501 in Pangkal Pinang]. Kompas (in Indonesian). Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  53. ^ "Missing AirAsia plane: Bodies recovered by Indonesian military in seas off Borneo island, crash site of airliner". NYDailyNews. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  54. ^ "Media Release". Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  55. ^ a b "Live updates: AirAsia Flight QZ8501 missing". Today. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  56. ^ "Low Tiong Lai on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  57. ^ "Malaysia to aid Indonesia, sends three military vessels, aircraft to search for missing AirAsia plane". Mail Online. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  58. ^ "QZ8501: Malaysia hantar tiga kapal, satu pesawat dalam operasi SAR" [QZ8501: Malaysia ships three vessels, one aircraft in SAR operation]. Astro Awani (in Malay). Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  59. ^ Binskin, Mark (29 December 2014). "Mak Binskin – Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
  60. ^ "India Puts Military Assets on Standby for Missing AirAsia Jet". WSJ. 29 December 2014.
  61. ^ "AirAsia QZ8501: US warship to join search for missing aircraft; oceanographer confident plane will be found". ABC News (Australia). Australian Broadcasting Corporation. 30 December 2014. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  62. ^ "USS Fort Worth joins destroyer Sampson in AirAsia search and recovery". Stars and Stripes. 3 January 2015. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  63. ^ "AirAsia flight QZ8501: icing of engines likely cause of crash, says agency". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  64. ^ Johnston, Chris (24 January 2015). "AirAsia flight QZ8501: four more bodies recovered from wreckage". The Guardian. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  65. ^ "AirAsia disaster: pilots disabled computers moments before crash". The Sydney Morning Herald. 29 January 2015. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  66. ^ "AirAsia Indonesia Flight QZ8501 Update (as of 1 January 2015 8:00 PM (GMT+7)". AirAsia Indonesia. Retrieved 1 January 2015.
  67. ^ "MSDF destroyers, choppers to help with AirAsia jet search". Japan Times. 10 May 2013. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  68. ^ "Indonesia hopes for Russia divers in search through AirAsia jet crash area". Itar Tass. Archived from the original on 3 January 2015. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  69. ^ "Chinese military jet, vessel join search for missing AirAsia flight". Xinhua. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  70. ^ a b "Pengerahan 2 Kapal Tanker MemaksImalkan Proses Pencarian" [Mobilizing 2 Tankers Maximizes the Search Process] (in Indonesian). Basarnas. 2 January 2015. Archived from the original on 3 January 2015. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
  71. ^ "Update Posisi Kapal Kemenhub Dalam Pencarian Korban Pesawat Air Asia" [Update on the Position of Ministry of Transportation in Searching for Victims of Air Asia Aircraft] (in Indonesian). Indonesian Ministry of Transport. 2 January 2015. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
  72. ^ "AirAsia 8501 crash: Official search for bodies ends". ozip. 17 March 2015. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  73. ^ AirAsia. "AirAsia Indonesia Flight QZ8501 | AirAsia". qz8501.airasia.com. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
  74. ^ "AirAsia Indonesia 8501 Crash Update On Search And Recovery Operations; Some Remains Indentified [sic]". Youth Health. 17 April 2015. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  75. ^ Pearlman, Jonathan (30 December 2014). "AirAsia QZ8501 wreckage found by fisherman who did not know plane was missing". The Telegraph. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  76. ^ "QZ8501: Objects sighted in Bangka, Pulau Tujuh". New Straits Times Online. 30 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  77. ^ "Puing Diduga Air Asia Ditemukan Nelayan Bangka" [Suspected Airasia Debris Found by Bangka Fishermen]. Tempo (in Indonesian). 30 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  78. ^ a b "AirAsia QZ8501: Local fisherman crucial in locating wreckage". The Star Online. 31 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  79. ^ "Live Update Pencarian Korban AirAsia QZ8501 Hari Keempat" [Live Update Search for Victims of AirAsia QZ8501 Day Four]. (in Indonesian). 31 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  80. ^ "AirAsia QZ8501: Items resembling plane door, emergency slide spotted in missing plane search, Indonesian authorities say". ABC News. AU: Australian Broadcasting Corp. 30 December 2014. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  81. ^ Serpihan Tersebar di Selat Karimata, akan Diangkat Basarnas [Fragments Spread over the Karimata Strait, will be Appointed Basarnas] (in Indonesian), Indonesia: CNN, 30 December 2014, archived from the original on 17 November 2015
  82. ^ Badan SAR Telusuri Tiga Lokasi Ditemukannya Serpihan [SAR Agency Searched for Three Locations of Flake Found] (in Indonesian), CNN, 30 December 2014, archived from the original on 20 November 2015
  83. ^ "Kemenhub Pastikan Serpihan di Selat Karimata Bagian Pesawat" [Ministry of Transportation Ensures Fragments in Karimata Strait Parts of Aircraft], News (in Indonesian), detik, 30 December 2014
  84. ^ "Diduga Jasad Korban AirAsia Mengapung di Teluk Kumai" [Suspected AirAsia Victimization Float in Kumai Bay]. Okezone (in Indonesian). Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  85. ^ "3 Mayat Diduga Korban Air Asia Ditemukan Basarnas", Tempo, 30 December 2014
  86. ^ "Basarnas Pastikan Serpihan dan Jasad Korban AirAsia Ditemukan Selat Karimata" [Basarnas Ensures Fragments and Bodies of AirAsia Survivors Found in Karimata Strait], Poskota News (in Indonesian), 30 December 2014, archived from the original on 30 December 2014, retrieved 30 December 2014
  87. ^ "AirAsia QZ8501: Officials say debris is missing plane". BBC News. 30 December 2014. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  88. ^ "Search for Flight QZ8501: 30 December 2014". News. BBC. Retrieved 30 December 2014.
  89. ^ "AirAsia QZ8501: Multiple bodies recovered in the search for missing plane, National Search and Rescue Agency spokesman says". ABC News. AU: Australian Broadcasting Corp. 31 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  90. ^ Otto, Ben; Stacey, Daniel; Pasztor, Andy (30 December 2014). "Debris From Missing AirAsia Plane Found". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  91. ^ "AirAsia flight QZ8501: Little headway in search ops due to bad weather; 7 bodies found so far". The Straits Times. 31 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  92. ^ "Sonar finds location of downed AirAsia Flight 8501". CBS News. 30 December 2014. Retrieved 31 December 2014.
  93. ^ "Penemuan 2 Objek Besar Meniadi Titik Terang POSISI Pesawat Air Asia QZ 8501" [Discovery of 2 Large Objects Becomes Bright Point POSZ Aircraft Asia QZ 8501] (in Indonesian). Basarnas. 3 January 2015. Archived from the original on 3 January 2015. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  94. ^ "Four large sections of AirAsia Flight QZ8501 found: 2 January 2015". The Financial Express. Reuters. Archived from the original on 3 January 2015. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
  95. ^ a b "Kembali Ditemukan Objek Yang Lebih Besar" [A Larger Object Is Found Again] (in Indonesian). Basarnas. 4 January 2015. Archived from the original on 4 January 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
  96. ^ AirAsia flight: first pictures released of plane under water, TheGuardian.com, 7 January 2015
  97. ^ New Day. 7 January 2015. CNN.
  98. ^ Ibrahim, Achmad (7 January 2015). "AirAsia Flight 8501: First pictures released of tail found under water". Toronto Star. Associated Press.
  99. ^ "BBC News – AirAsia QZ8501: Plane tail lifted from seabed". BBC News. 10 January 2015. Retrieved 10 January 2015.
  100. ^ Paddock, Richard C. (10 January 2015). "AirAsia Flight 8501: Tail Recovered – WSJ". WSJ. Retrieved 10 January 2015.
  101. ^ "AirAsia flight QZ8501: Tail of plane lifted to surface but black box still not found". 10 January 2015.
  102. ^ "FDR dan CVR QZ8501 Selesai Diunduh". KEMENTERIAN PERHUBUNGAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA (in Indonesian). 15 January 2015. Retrieved 17 January 2015.
  103. ^ "Searchers recover one black box from AirAsia Flight QZ8501, find the other". CNN. 12 January 2015. Retrieved 12 January 2015.
  104. ^ "AirAsia Flight QZ8501: Cockpit voice recorder recovered". 13 January 2015. Retrieved 14 January 2015.
  105. ^ "Searchers find AirAsia QZ8501's fuselage in Java Sea". CNN. Cable News Network. Retrieved 14 January 2015.
  106. ^ "AirAsia QZ8501: Fresh bid to raise fuselage fails". BBC News. 25 January 2015. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
  107. ^ a b "Underwater search for AirAsia flight QZ8501 resumes". The Guardian. 5 January 2015. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  108. ^ "QZ8501". AirAsia (updated statement). Facebook. 28 December 2014. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  109. ^ "Menhub: Semua Kapal Diminta Beritahu jika Ada Informasi Pesawat Jatuh". Kompas. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  110. ^ "Posko Penumpang AirAsia QZ 8501 Juga Dibuka di Bandara Soekarno-Hatta". Kompas. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  111. ^ "Angkasa Pura 1 Makassar Buka Posko Informasi AirAsia QZ 8501". Kompas. Retrieved 28 December 2014.
  112. ^ "Indonesia AirAsia Retires Flight Number QZ8501/8502 from 31DEC14". airlineroute.net. Archived from the original on 31 December 2014. Retrieved 2 January 2015.
  113. ^ "Indonesia AirAsia is suspending flights between Surabaya - Singapore".
  114. ^ Fernandes, Tony (1 December 2015). "Investigation determines cause of AirAsia crash last December". Twitter. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  115. ^ a b Karmini, Niniek (1 December 2015). "AirAsia crash caused by faulty rudder system, pilot response, Indonesia says". Toronto Star. Toronto, Canada. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  116. ^ Wellman, Alex; Shammas, Alex. "11:00 Airbus waiting to comment". The Mirror. Mirror Online. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  117. ^ "AirAsia Surabaya-Singapore service given approval at Singapore end". Channel NewsAsia. Archived from the original on 4 January 2015. Retrieved 4 January 2015.
  118. ^ "AirAsia flight QZ8501 search area expanded". BBC News. 6 January 2015. Retrieved 6 January 2015.
  119. ^ "Fixing the Air Navigation System". Indonesia Infrastructure Initiative. Suara Pembaruan. Archived from the original on 5 July 2015. Retrieved 26 January 2015.
  120. ^ Stacey, Daniel (15 January 2015). "Indonesian Air-Traffic Control Is Unsophisticated, Pilots Say". The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 26 January 2015.
  121. ^ "West Kotawaringin to build AirAsia crash memorial". The Jakarta Post. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  122. ^ "AIRASIA FLIGHT QZ8501: CREW, PASSENGERS AND FAMILIES". Channel News Asia. 28 December 2014. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  123. ^ "Monash Gives Honorary Degree to Kevin Soetjipto". ozip. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  124. ^ "Keluarga Korban Peringati 1 Tahun Tragedi Jatuhnya Pesawat AirAsia" [Family of Victims Commemorating 1 Year of the AirAsia Airplane Tragedy]. voaindonesia.com (in Indonesian). VOA Indonesia. 28 December 2015. Retrieved 27 August 2016.
  125. ^ Salam Wiyono, Adrian (28 December 2015). "1 Tahun tragedi AirAsia QZ 8501, keluarga korban gelar doa bersama" (in Indonesian). Merdeka. Retrieved 27 August 2016.
  126. ^ a b "QZ8501: French judge to probe crash, possible 'manslaughter'". Malay Mail Online. AFP. 31 January 2015. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
  127. ^ "Surabaya govt could sue AirAsia over insurance issue". The Jakarta Post. Archived from the original on 23 July 2015. Retrieved 8 February 2015.
  128. ^ "10 families sue AirAsia, Airbus over fatal QZ8501 crash". The Malay Online. Retrieved 30 June 2015.
  129. ^ "QZ8501: 10 families sue AirAsia, Airbus". Astro Awani. Retrieved 1 July 2015.
  130. ^ Tan, Andrea (30 June 2015). "Airbus Sued by AirAsia Crash Families Over Defective Systems". Bloomberg Business. Bloomberg. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  131. ^ Aris Siswanto et al. v Airbus, SAS et al., 1:15-cv-05486. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Chicago).
  132. ^ "AirAsia crash makes case for ejectable black boxes". Reuters. 8 January 2015. Retrieved 14 January 2015.
  133. ^ "Air Asia Incident Causes Decline in Foreign Visitor Number". Tempo. 2 April 2015. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  134. ^ Koren, Marina (1 December 2015). "What Brought AirAsia Flight 8501 Down?". The Atlantic. The Atlantic Monthly Group. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  135. ^ "Data Recorder From AirAsia Flight Successfully Downloaded". WSJ. 13 January 2015. Retrieved 3 January 2015.
  136. ^ "The imperative of government transparency in crisis communication: the case of AirAsia QZ8501 crash". Retrieved 8 May 2019.
  137. ^ "AirAsia flight QZ8501: icing of engines likely cause of crash, says agency". Retrieved 18 May 2015.
  138. ^ "Underwater search for AirAsia flight QZ8501 resumesr". The Guardian. 5 January 2015. Retrieved 5 May 2015.
  139. ^ "Rudder malfunction caused AirAsia crash, says panel". Asia Times. 1 December 2015. Archived from the original on 1 December 2015. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  140. ^ a b c "Deadly Solution". Mayday. Season 16. National Geographic Channel.
  141. ^ "AirAsia crash: Faulty part 'major factor'". BBC. 1 December 2015. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  142. ^ "Incorrect crew response caused AirAsia A320 Crash – Aviation Analysis Wing". Retrieved 19 May 2016.
  143. ^ "Torqued: Air Asia Crash Highlights Risks of In-flight Troubleshooting". Aviation International News. Retrieved 19 May 2016.
  144. ^ "AirAsia 8501 CVR Transcript". Retrieved 19 May 2016.
  145. ^ Calder, Simon (1 December 2015). "AirAsia flight QZ8501: Catalogue of errors that led to crash revealed". The Independent. London, England. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  146. ^ Kapoor, Kanupriya; Jensen, Fergus (1 December 2015). "Indonesia says faulty part, crew action factors in AirAsia crash". Reuters. Reuters Thomson. Retrieved 2 December 2015.
  147. ^ Siva Govindasamy, Kanupriya Kapoor and Tim Hepher (30 January 2015). "AirAsia captain left seat before jet lost control: sources". Reuters. Retrieved 31 January 2015.
  148. ^ "Faulty component, crew action caused crash of AirAsia flight QZ8501: Report". Reuters. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  149. ^ Karmini, Niniek; Press, Associated (1 December 2015). "Faulty part, pilot response blamed for AirAsia crash". CTV News. Bell Media.
  150. ^ Cochrane, Joe (1 December 2015). "Indonesia Cites Resetting of Circuit Breaker in 2014 AirAsia Crash". The New York Times. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
  151. ^ Yosephine, Liza (13 December 2015). "Government to tighten regulations following AirAsia accident". The Jakarta Post. Jakarta. Retrieved 3 December 2015.
  152. ^ Ranter, Harro. "Accident description". asndata.aviation-safety.net. Retrieved 28 May 2019.

External links

Map all coordinates using: OpenStreetMap 
Download coordinates as: KML · GPX

Wikinews-logo.svg Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501 at Wikinews Media related to Indonesia AirAsia Flight 8501 at Wikimedia Commons

3 August 2014

A 6.1 magnitude earthquake killed over 617 people in Yunnan, China.

The 2014 Ludian earthquake struck Ludian County, Yunnan, China, with a moment magnitude of 6.1 on 3 August. The earthquake killed at least 617 people, injuring at least 2,400 others. As of 5 August 2014, 112 people remain missing. Over 12,000 houses collapsed and 30,000 were damaged. According to the United States Geological Survey, the earthquake occurred 29 km WSW of Zhaotong city at 16:03 local time 08:03 UTC.

The Ludian earthquake occurred at 16:03, Beijing time 08:03 UTC, on 3 August 2014. American geological surveys indicated that the epicenter was 29 km WSW of Zhaotong city at a depth of 10.0 km, in the quake-prone province of Yunnan in southwestern China, about 18 km from Zhaotong. It was especially felt in the province of Yunnan, and less in the provinces of Guizhou and Sichuan.

The magnitude of the earthquake was 6.1 on the moment magnitude scale, with an intensity of up to VII on the Mercalli intensity scale. The quake was the result of a strike-slip fault, whose fault plane has a southwest-northeast strike.

Seismicity in this region of southeast Asia is the direct result of the orogenic activity of the Himalayan mountain belt. Due to the complex interaction between the Eurasian Plate and Indo-Australian Plate from Afghanistan in the west to Burma and China in the east, many shallow sub-surface faults are present in both southwest China and neighbouring Myanmar.

Recent earthquakes
This particular part of Yunnan Province was struck by the Mw 6.3 Burma earthquake in 2003. Similar events have occurred in recent years due to strike-slip faulting in the nearby vicinity, such as the 2006 Yunnan earthquake of magnitude 5.0, which killed 19 people, the largest of recent times, the Mw 7.9 2008 Sichuan earthquake, which killed over 69,000 people, the Mw 6.9 2011 Shan earthquake, and more recently, the 2012 Yunnan earthquakes, which was the result of reverse faulting and not strike-slip faulting like the Ludian earthquake, killing 81 people and injuring 821 others.

he earthquake caused significant damage in the immediate vicinity of the epicenter, principally in the city of Zhaotong, where power outages and significant structural damage were reported. Chinese authorities announced that the quake left at least 391 dead, and over 1,801 injured.

According to the South China Morning Post, the tremor was felt in nearby towns, including the capital of Yunnan, Kunming, also in Chongqing, Leshan and Chengdu in the neighboring province of Sichuan. Road access to Longquan Village of Longtoushan Town, Ludian County, was blocked, where buildings collapsed. In Ludian, it was reported that around 12,000 homes had collapsed, many of them being aged brick structures.

Aftershock: 21 August 6:00 a.m. until 9 UTC in times or morethan nine times more than M 3.0 up by China Seismic Bureau. The largest aftershock earthquake M 4.2.

27 September 2014

Mount Ontake in Japan erupts.


A volcanic eruption of Mount Ontake took place on September 27, 2014, killing 63 people. Mount Ontake is a volcano located on the Japanese island of Honshu around 100 kilometres northeast of Nagoya and around 200 km West of Tokyo. It was the first fatal volcanic eruption in Japan since the 1991 collapse of a lava dome at Mount Unzen,and the deadliest volcanic eruption in Japan since Torishima killed an estimated 150 people in 1902.

The volcanic eruption happened at 11:52 Japan Standard Time. There were no significant earthquakes that might have warned authorities in the lead up to the phreatic eruption—caused by ground water flashing to steam in a hydrothermal explosion. The mountain is a popular tourist attraction for hikers, being considered good for beginner climbers and relatively safe, and the weather was also good, so there were several hundred people on its slopes at the time.The police said that they were searching for people remaining on the mountain. By 17:00 the police reported that three people were missing and were believed to be under ash. Another person was rescued from under the volcanic ash, but remained unconscious. Six people were injured, one by flying rocks.

By 19:30, the number of people believed to remain buried in ash rose to six. Nine people had been reported to be injured, five of whom had fractured bones Later, at least 40 people were reported to be injured, and another 32 were believed to be missing. The JSDF began carrying out helicopter searches for missing people. One woman was reported to have died from the eruption.

On September 28, the police reported that over 30 people had been found in “cardiac arrest” near the summit. Japanese emergency services often refer to people who show no vital signs, and are apparently dead, as being in cardiac arrest, as legally, only an authorised physician can pronounce a person dead.

By September 29, a total of 36 bodies had been found, and 12 people had been pronounced dead; the search was suspended due to dangerous conditions, including hydrogen sulfide gas spewing from the mountain. On September 30, fears of escalating volcanic activity on Mount Ontake continued to hinder rescue efforts.

17 July 2014

Malaysia Airlines Flight 17 is shot down near the border between Ukraine and Russia.


A Malaysia Airlines passenger jet crashed in a rebel-controlled part of eastern Ukraine on Thursday, spurring swift accusations from Ukrainian officials that “terrorists” shot down the aircraft.

The United States has concluded a missile shot down the plane, but hasn’t pinpointed who was responsible, a senior U.S. official told CNN’s Barbara Starr.

The Boeing 777 with 298 people aboard fell from the sky near the town of Torez in the Donetsk region of eastern Ukraine, officials said. A top Ukrainian official said the plane, which was on the way from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, was flying at about 10,000 meters (nearly 33,000 feet) when the missile hit.

A radar system saw a surface-to-air missile system turn on and track an aircraft right before the plane went down, the senior U.S. official said. A second system saw a heat signature at the time the airliner was hit, the official said. The United States is analyzing the trajectory of the missile to try to learn where the attack came from, the official said.

The Obama administration believes Ukraine did not have the capability in the region — let alone the motivation — to shoot down the plane, a U.S. official told CNN’s Jake Tapper.

23 June 2014

Syria’s declared chemical weapons are shipped out for destruction.

 photo Syria-chemical-weapons-Ar-011_zpsuy5rc8ni.jpg

Syria has handed over the last of its declared stockpile of chemical weapons, which will be destroyed at sea over the next two months, the UN’s chemical weapons watchdog has said.

The Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical weapons (OPCW) announced that the final 8% of Syria’s acknowledged arsenal of chemical weapons and precursors had been loaded on to a Danish freighter.

The ship, the Ark Futura, is now sailing to the Italian port of Gioia Tauro for a rendezvous with an American vessel, the MV Cape Ray, which is specially equipped to neutralise the most dangerous of the chemical agents at sea.

“The mission to eliminate Syria’s chemical weapons programme has been a major undertaking marked by an extraordinary international cooperation,” said Ahmet Uzumcu, the OPCW’s director-general. “Never before has an entire arsenal of a category of weapons of mass destruction been removed from a country experiencing a state of internal armed conflict. And this has been accomplished within very demanding and tight timeframes.”

However, Uzumcu added that the OPCW was not in a position to certify that Syria no longer had any chemical weapons. The materials removed were those that the regime had declared.

Western governments claim to have intelligence suggesting that Damascus has not admitted to all its chemical arms. An OPCW investigation team has found evidence that chlorine gas was used against civilians in recent months “in a systematic manner”, but the team has been unable to reach the site for further investigation because it came under attack.

Possession of chlorine is not a violation of the chemical weapons treaty, as it is a commonly used chemical, so Syria was not required to list chlorine on its declared inventory. But its use as a weapon is a violation of international law.